Hash #96: NIL, NCAA vs. House, and Impact to Internation SAs
The recent House v. NCAA settlement, which permits direct revenue-sharing payments to student-athletes, introduces significant challenges for international athletes due to U.S. immigration laws.
Key Issues:
💼 Visa Restrictions: International student-athletes typically hold F-1 visas, which impose strict limitations on employment. Accepting direct payments from universities could violate these terms, potentially leading to visa revocation or deportation.
🏫 Institutional Risks: Universities that provide direct compensation to international athletes without proper work authorization may face legal liabilities, including civil and criminal penalties, reputational damage, and potential loss of federal funding.
🌐 Ivy League Stance: The Ivy League has opted out of the House settlement, choosing not to participate in direct revenue-sharing with athletes. This decision reflects concerns about maintaining amateurism and the potential complexities introduced by such payments.
These developments highlight the intricate balance between evolving NCAA policies and existing immigration regulations, underscoring the need for comprehensive solutions to support international student-athletes.
https://frontofficesports.com/house-settlement-international-athletes/